Fitbit Versa 3 vs. Garmin Venu Sq is the best fitness tracker death match you can find for a really good price. Both companies have a strong following and are fully aware of what their customers want: high-quality construction, accurate sensors, and practical health (and smart) features at a competitive price. Both the Fitbit Versa 3 and the Garmin Venu Sq can be viewed as excellent purchases from this angle.
Fitbit Versa 2
Although this Watch gets scratched extremely readily, its functioning has been fairly reliable. I used mine while swimming or something, and it has a lot of nicks on it. It has various apps that I frequently use, like the weather app.
Its primary issue is that it has trouble connecting to my 13-inch iPhone. It connects on some days but not others, which is not very helpful. It does have the find phone app, which allows me to make my phone beep if I can’t find it, which greatly reduces my stress (assuming it connects).
Garmin Venu Sq
The Garmin Venu Sq is a reliable all-around performer, and this is the first time a Garmin watch with a color display has been offered at this price. The issue is that the original Venu, which was more expensive, has better screen quality and design.
We had mixed thoughts about the less expensive Venu because of the antiquated watch interface and the slow GPS. While you get the same familiar sports tracking experience, we wish it looked more similar to its more expensive counterpart.
Fitbit Versa 2 vs Garmin Venu Sq: What is the difference?
The Fitbit Versa 3 has a GPS battery life of “up to” 12 hours, whereas the Garmin Venu Sq has a GPS battery life of “up to” 14 hours. This means that if you use either band to track outside runs, neither will survive for six days; instead, they will last for more like 4-5, which is still rather impressive for a fitness tracker.